Data Migration Risks and the Checklist You Need to Avoid Them
Table of Contents
Data migration risks aren’t some abstract concern that only Fortune 500 companies worry about. They’re the reason your supposedly straightforward database upgrade turns into a three-week firefighting exercise. According to Bloor Group, over 80% of data migration projects run over time or budget, and that’s not because teams aren’t trying hard enough. It’s because migrations are deceptively complex, with risks ranging from data loss and security breaches to extended downtime and corrupted records that surface weeks after go-live.
Even “simple” migrations can spiral into disasters when a single overlooked dependency breaks your entire analytics pipeline or when that test migration that worked perfectly somehow corrupts 10% of production data. The stakes are real. Lost customer records, broken compliance requirements, and teams unable to access critical data for days aren’t edge cases. They happen regularly.
This article walks through the 10 most common data migration risks and, more importantly, how to avoid them. We’ll cover everything from the obvious threats like data loss to the sneaky ones like schema drift that only surface after deployment.
Table of Contents
- 10 data migration risks that every data team should avoid
- How to mitigate data migration risks
- Data validation and testing strategies
- How to minimize downtime during data migration
- Stop running into data migration issues
10 data migration risks that every data team should avoid
A recent Experian study found that 64% of data migration projects they analyzed went over budget and that only 46% of projects were delivered on time. Less than 70% of projects were considered a success. It would be naïve to think that any migration project will go on without any hiccups. Below are the ten most critical risks that data teams encounter, along with what makes each one particularly dangerous.
1. Data loss
Data loss is the most obvious risk. Critical records might not make it to the target destination, leading to permanent loss of information. This happens more often than teams expect, typically due to format incompatibilities, field truncation during transformation, or failed transfers that go unnoticed until someone realizes half their customer history is missing.
The consequences extend to missing records. Lost transaction data means financial reconciliation becomes impossible. Missing customer interactions leave support teams blind. And if backups weren’t properly maintained before migration, that data is gone forever.
Thorough backup strategies and migration testing are non-negotiable safeguards against this risk.
2. Data integrity issues
Data corruption occurs when migrated data becomes invalid or garbled, such as numeric fields turning into gibberish due to type mismatches or encoding problems. A decimal handling error might double every financial amount in your database. Dates might all default to 01/01/1970 because of format mismatches between environments.
Common culprits include string truncation, incompatible data types between the source environment and target platforms, and character encoding issues that turn special characters into question marks. The worst part about corruption is that it’s often hidden. Your migration completes “successfully,” row counts match, but the data itself is silently broken. These errors compound downstream, breaking reports, calculations, and analytics in ways that erode trust in your entire data infrastructure.
Validation and checksum comparisons between source and target data are essential to catch these issues before they propagate.
3. Duplicate or inconsistent data (data quality issues)
Data quality issues like duplicate entries or inconsistent values easily creep in during migration, creating confusion and inaccuracies throughout your environment. Migrating in batches or re-running failed jobs without proper controls accidentally creates duplicate records. Poor source data quality carries over into the new environment, following the garbage-in, garbage-out principle.
Imagine customer John Doe appearing twice in the new database with slight variations in his record. Reports double-count his activity, marketing sends duplicate emails, and revenue metrics become inflated. Meanwhile, inconsistent data formats mean the same customer might have three different date formats across their records, breaking any time-based analysis.
Data profiling and cleansing before migration, combined with thorough reconciliation afterward, are necessary to maintain data quality. Without these controls, you’re not just moving data, you’re amplifying existing problems.
The financial impact compounds quickly when duplicates distort every business metric from customer acquisition costs to churn rates. What starts as a data quality issue becomes a credibility problem when leadership discovers months of reporting was based on flawed numbers.
4. Schema and compatibility errors
Schema and compatibility errors occur when the target platform’s data model doesn’t align with the source, leading to mis-mapped fields or dropped data entirely. Different databases handle data types differently. An integer field in PostgreSQL might have different precision limits than the same field in Oracle, causing numeric inaccuracies that only surface during financial calculations.
A field like “TotalAmount” might end up mapped to the wrong column, or worse, interpreted with the wrong scale, turning $100.00 into 10000 cents or vice versa. Foreign key relationships break when referenced tables don’t migrate in the correct order. Constraints that worked fine in the source database suddenly start rejecting valid data in the target.
Careful schema mapping and transformation rules must be planned upfront, with continuous monitoring for schema drift throughout the migration process.
These errors multiply in complex environments where critical fields interpret differently between platforms, causing data to disappear or transform incorrectly. Production deployments expose problems that testing missed, forcing emergency rollbacks.
5. Extended data downtime
Extended data downtime is a major risk when migration processes run longer than expected or require operations to be offline, disrupting business continuity entirely. That two-hour maintenance window you scheduled? It stretches to eight hours when network slowdowns hit, transformation jobs fail, or rollback procedures activate.
During this time, users can’t access critical applications, transactions can’t process, and revenue-generating operations grind to a halt. A retail company migrating their inventory database during what they thought would be a quiet Sunday morning watched helplessly as the migration extended into Monday’s business hours, costing them hundreds of thousands in lost sales.
Meticulous planning, execution during true low-traffic windows, and phased cutover strategies can prevent these scenarios. The key is having realistic time estimates that account for Murphy’s Law.
6. Performance degradation
Performance issues arise when the new platform struggles with incoming data volume or workload, leading to slow queries and unstable applications. After migration, those sub-second queries suddenly take minutes. BI dashboards that users rely on for daily decisions start timing out. The new data warehouse that was supposed to improve performance actually makes everything worse.
This happens when migration scripts aren’t optimized, when the target infrastructure isn’t properly sized for the data volume, or when indices and partitioning strategies don’t translate between platforms. One company discovered their new cloud warehouse performed beautifully during testing with sample data but crawled to a standstill with production volumes because they hadn’t accounted for query patterns in their index design.
Teams must monitor performance during test migrations and optimize ETL/ELT processes to maintain acceptable speeds.
The business impact surfaces immediately when sales teams can’t access customer data during calls and real-time dashboards become useless. What begins as a platform upgrade often becomes an expensive re-architecture project.
7. Integration and dependency failures
Integration failures happen when connected applications or downstream processes break due to the migration. A modern data stack has dozens of interconnected tools and pipelines. Your migration might require repointing BI tools, updating ETL jobs, modifying API endpoints, and reconfiguring event streams. Miss one, and data stops flowing.
Data dependencies create another trap. That seemingly unused table you decided not to migrate? Three downstream jobs actually needed it, and now they’re failing silently. A marketing analytics pipeline expects Table X to update hourly, but that table was left behind in the migration, causing campaign reports to show zero conversions.
Comprehensive dependency mapping, including field-level lineage to understand what feeds what, prevents these failures. Every integration needs verification in a staging environment before production cutover.
8. Security breaches
Security breaches are a serious data migration risk where sensitive data becomes exposed during transit or in the new environment if not properly secured. During migration, data travels through intermediate storage, across networks, and into new environments with different security configurations. Without proper encryption and access controls, you’re essentially broadcasting sensitive information.
Customer credit card data intercepted during a cloud migration, personally identifiable information exposed due to misconfigured permissions in the new database, or medical records accessible to unauthorized users because role-based access wasn’t properly replicated. These aren’t hypothetical scenarios. They result in regulatory fines, lawsuits, and destroy customer trust. Compliance requirements like GDPR or HIPAA add legal consequences to any security lapses.
Encryption, secure transfer protocols, and thorough security testing are mandatory, not optional. Security incidents during migration trigger regulatory investigations, breach notifications, and reputation damage that cost millions. Trust, once broken, takes years to rebuild.
9. Data governance issues
Compliance risks arise if migrations violate data regulations or internal governance policies, such as moving data to non-compliant regions or losing required audit logs. It’s surprisingly easy to break regulations during migration. Move EU customer data to US servers without proper safeguards, and you’ve violated GDPR. Fail to maintain audit trails during migration, and you’ve broken SOX compliance.
Access controls that worked in the old environment might not translate correctly, suddenly giving broad access to restricted data. Data retention policies get lost in translation, keeping data that should be deleted or deleting data that must be retained. Required data lineage for regulatory reporting disappears when platforms change.
Teams must include compliance officers in migration planning and use automated tools to verify governance rules post-migration.
Regulatory consequences surface during audits when you cannot prove compliance retroactively. Missing audit trails and lost data lineage become impossible to reconstruct after the fact.
10. Insufficient user training
Lack of training is a hidden data migration risk where users unfamiliar with new tools or processes inadvertently cause errors or revert to old workflows. After go-live, analysts who don’t understand the new schema create incorrect reports. Engineers unfamiliar with the new data platform accidentally overwrite production data. Business users input data incorrectly because the new interface differs from what they knew.
The migration team itself contributes to this risk. Running the wrong script on production data, misconfiguring replication settings, or misunderstanding requirements can cause catastrophic failures. One misplaced command by an untrained engineer can undo weeks of careful migration work.
Proper documentation, comprehensive training sessions, and gradual onboarding reduce these risks. Technology is only as reliable as the people operating it.
How to mitigate data migration risks
While data migration risks are plentiful, careful planning and best practices can drastically reduce the chance of disaster. Here are the key strategies to mitigate the risks outlined above.
Plan and assess thoroughly
Inventory all data assets, map dependencies, and assess complexity before touching anything. Involve everyone who touches the data, including DBAs, engineers, and business users, to capture requirements and constraints you’d otherwise miss. A detailed migration plan with clear timelines and responsibilities preempts most schema issues and missing data problems.
Establish backup and rollback plans
Maintain full backups of source data and have a tested rollback strategy ready. If the migration fails catastrophically, you need the ability to restore operations without data loss. Snapshot databases before migration and ensure your contingency plan can quickly restore service if the new platform fails.
Choose the right tools and vendors
Select migration tools that handle large volumes, validate data integrity, and ensure security during transfer. Cloud provider migration services and established ETL tools reduce risk compared to custom scripts. Tools with built-in validation and detailed logging help catch errors early. Data observability platforms can monitor data health throughout the migration, alerting you to anomalies before they become incidents.
Conduct a test run (migration rehearsal)
Simulate the migration end-to-end in a lower environment with representative data. This uncovers schema mismatches, performance bottlenecks, and integration problems at a manageable scale. Run multiple test migrations, refining the process each time until it’s bulletproof.
Migrate in phases or during low-usage windows
Avoid big-bang migrations. Move one department’s data at a time or run old and new platforms in parallel to catch issues early. Schedule migrations during genuine off-peak hours to limit business impact when things inevitably take longer than planned.
Monitor and validate continuously
During and after migration, monitor data quality and performance in real-time. Implement automated data quality checks comparing row counts, financial totals, and key metrics between old and new environments. Data anomaly detection allows fixes before users notice problems.
Have a post-migration support plan
Dedicate resources to address issues immediately after migration. Train users proactively and keep the migration team on standby for urgent fixes. Conduct a thorough post-mortem to capture lessons learned.
Data validation and testing strategies
Even after careful planning, you must validate data after migration to ensure everything is transferred correctly. Here are the concrete validation tactics that catch issues before they impact your business.
Automated data reconciliation
Compare source and target data using automated tools or scripts that verify row counts, checksums, and data distributions between old and new platforms. Run SQL queries that confirm record counts match for each table and that critical aggregations like revenue totals, customer counts, and transaction sums are consistent. When these basic checks fail, you know exactly where to investigate.
Sample testing and spot checks
Pick critical data segments such as your most important customers, recent transactions, or high-value records and manually verify they migrated intact. This human review catches subtle issues automated checks might miss, like business logic that doesn’t quite translate or edge cases that break in the new environment.
Schema and constraint checks
Validate that the target schema has all expected tables and columns, and that no constraints are broken. Run queries to ensure primary keys remain unique, foreign keys still reference valid records, and required fields contain data. Profile the data to detect schema drift and confirm data types match expectations.
Parallel run / dual reporting
For critical migrations, run both platforms simultaneously for a defined period. Compare reports, dashboards, and key metrics from both environments. When outputs match, you have confidence the migration succeeded. When they don’t, you can investigate discrepancies before decommissioning the old platform.
User acceptance testing
Involve actual end-users to validate data through real use cases. The analyst who runs monthly reports knows if something looks wrong. The support team recognizes when customer data doesn’t match their expectations. These users catch issues that technical validation might miss.
How to minimize downtime during data migration
To minimize downtime, organizations should adopt strategies like phased migrations, backup environments, and careful scheduling to keep operations available. The worst migrations are the ones where a promised two-hour maintenance window stretches into a full day of frantic troubleshooting while revenue operations sit idle.
Phased or parallel migration offers the best protection against extended outages. Instead of attempting a big-bang cutover, migrate data in stages while maintaining operational continuity. Move one department’s data while others continue working. Keep the old platform running in read-only mode until you’ve verified the new one. If something breaks, you’re fixing one piece, not rebuilding everything.
Modern replication tools make near-zero downtime migrations possible. Database replication and change data capture continuously sync data to the new platform while the old one remains operational. When you’re ready for cutover, you’re closing a gap of minutes rather than transferring days of data. The switchover becomes quick, and switching back is equally fast if problems emerge.
Scheduling matters more than most teams realize. What looks like a quiet Sunday morning in New York could be Monday’s business hours in Sydney. You need backup operational processes ready too. Can you route critical transactions elsewhere temporarily? Having these contingencies turns potential disasters into managed inconveniences.
The best way to minimize downtime is thorough testing that eliminates surprises. Every rehearsal reveals issues you’ll face in production. Well-tested migrations run predictably because you’ve already solved the problems. The actual migration becomes execution of a proven playbook rather than discovery of what might go wrong.
Stop running into data migration issues
Data migration risks, from data loss to extended downtime, are very real, but they can be managed with the right approach. By understanding the ten common risks outlined here and applying proven mitigation strategies like thorough planning, validation, and continuous monitoring, data teams can dramatically improve their migration success rates.
The difference between migrations that succeed and those that become cautionary tales isn’t luck. It’s preparation, testing, and having the right tools in place to catch problems early. Data observability platforms provide that extra layer of protection, monitoring data quality and lineage throughout your migration to surface issues before they impact your business.
This is where Monte Carlo’s data observability platform changes the game. Monte Carlo uses machine learning to automatically detect data quality issues the moment they occur during migration, alerting you when row counts diverge, schemas change unexpectedly, or data freshness degrades. You get automated alerts with root cause analysis before stakeholders notice problems, not after.
Monte Carlo’s AI observability platform learns your data’s normal patterns and surfaces data anomalies without requiring manual rules. Field-level lineage shows exactly which downstream processes are at risk, while automated circuit breakers prevent bad data from propagating. The platform integrates with your existing data stack, turning weeks of manual validation into continuous, automated monitoring that scales with your migration complexity.
Interested in learning how to keep data quality high once you’ve mitigated data migration risks and are in your new environment? Talk to us by filling out the form below.
Our promise: we will show you the product.
